1- Assistant Professor, Environmental Health Research Center, Research Institute for Health Development, Kurdistan University of Medical Sciences, Sanandaj, Iran & Assistant Professor, Environmental Health Research Center, Research Institute for Health Development, Kurdistan University of Medical Sciences, Sanandaj, Iran 2- Assistant Professor, Environmental Health Research Center, Research Institute for Health Development, Kurdistan University of Medical Sciences, Sanandaj, Iran & Assistant Professor, Environmental Health Research Center, Research Institute for Health Development, Kurdistan University of Medical Sciences, Sanandaj, Iran , f.mohammadian1986@gmail.com 3- MSc. Student, Student research committee, Kurdistan University of Medical Sciences, Sanandaj, Iran & MSc. Student, Student research committee, Kurdistan University of Medical Sciences, Sanandaj, Iran 4- Health Staff, Student research committee, Kurdistan University of Medical Sciences, Sanandaj, Iran & Health Staff, Student research committee, Kurdistan University of Medical Sciences, Sanandaj, Iran 5- Instructor, Environmental Health Research Center, Research Institute for Health Development, Kurdistan University of Medical Sciences, Sanandaj, Iran & Instructor, Environmental Health Research Center, Research Institute for Health Development, Kurdistan University of Medical Sciences, Sanandaj, Iran 6- Assistant Professor, Social Determinants of Health Research Center, Research Institute for Health Development, Kurdistan University of Medical Sciences, Sanandaj, Iran & Assistant Professor, Social Determinants of Health Research Center, Research Institute for Health Development, Kurdistan University of Medical Sciences, Sanandaj, Iran 7- Associate Professor, Social Determinants of Health Research Center, Research Institute for Health Development, Kurdistan University of Medical Sciences, Sanandaj, Iran & Associate Professor, Social Determinants of Health Research Center, Research Institute for Health Development, Kurdistan University of Medical Sciences, Sanandaj, Iran
Abstract: (1148 Views)
Abstract Background and Aim: Consideringthe increased number of students, staff and faculties and various educational and research departments in university environments, provision of a safe environment is one of the main challenges in the universities and higher education centers. The aim of this study was to perform a comprehensive and detailed assessment of risks in different departments of Kurdistan University of Medical Sciences. Material and Method: In thisdescriptive-analytical study we assessed buildings, laboratories, engine room heating systems, libraries and commuting routes at Kurdistan University of Medical Sciences. Fire risk assessment was performed in three areas of properties, people and activities by FRAME (Fire Risk Assessment Method for Engineering) software. The safety of laboratories was assessed by ACHiL (Assessment and Classification of Hazards in Laboratories) specific method. Failures in buildings, engine room heating systems, electrical panels and equipment were identified and evaluated by the FMEA (Failure Mode and Effect Analysis) method. The safety level of traffic and transportation routes, parking lots and streets were assessed by ET&BA (Energy Trace & Barrier Analysis) method. Results: The fire risk level for individuals, properties and activities in all colleges was unfavorable (R˃1). In the laboratory, the main risks were related to chemicals such as pressurized cylinders (R=12), corrosive substances (R=6) and toxic solutions (R=6). In the buildings, the highest risks were related to a fault in the emergency condition plan, non standard height of the stairs case and low width of the stairs. Also, in the engine room heating systems, most of the risks were related to fuel tanks (leaks of valves) and boilers (excessive temperature and pressure) with R2˃00. The electrical safety status was assessed unsuitable due to failures in the protection systems (grounding system and life-saving switch). Chemical and potential energies were among the most important energies damaging the paths and passages. Conclusion: The safety level of the campus is unfavorable and the safety conditions in all departments and activities are alarming. The main risk is the risk of fire and the most dangerous part is the engine room. Therefore, effective planning to control and manage the risks in the campus complex should be done on the basis of risk priority. e safety situation can help universities and academic institutions develop an effective risk management program.
1. Salazar-Escoboza MA, Laborin-Alvarez JF, Alvarez-Chavez CR, Noriega-Orozco L, Borbon-Morales C. Safety climate perceived by users of academic laboratories in higher education institutes. Saf Sci. 2020;12(1):93-9. [DOI:10.1016/j.ssci.2019.09.003]
2. Vinnem JE, Aven T. Case illustration of a decision framework for health, environment, and safety management. Proc Inst Mech Eng Part O J Risk Reliab. 2006;220(2):115-21. [DOI:10.1243/1748006XJRR12]
3. Bernardo LM, Beach M, Mitchell AM, Zoldos K. Disaster preparedness at the University of Pittsburgh School of nursing: four years of Progress. Disaster Manag Response. 2006;4(3):77-9. [DOI:10.1016/j.dmr.2006.05.002] [PMID]
4. Beck JD, Weintraub JA, Disney JA, Graves RC, Stamm JW, Kaste LM, et al. University of North Carolina Caries Risk Assessment Study: comparisons of High Risk Prediction, Any Risk Prediction, and Any Risk Biologic models. Community Dent Oral Epidemiol. 1992;20(6):313-21. [DOI:10.1111/j.1600-0528.1992.tb00690.x] [PMID]
5. Cruz A, Ignacio R, Fields S, Posillico J, Sexton T. Validation of the Falls Risk Assessment Tool utilized by the University Hospital at Stonybrook as a measure of in-hospital fall risk. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2001;56)4)100-110.
6. Marincioni F, Fraboni R. A baseline assessment of emergency planning and preparedness in Italian universities. Disasters. 2012;36(2):291-315. [DOI:10.1111/j.1467-7717.2011.01259.x] [PMID]
7. Al-Nammari F, Alzaghal M. Towards local disaster risk reduction in developing countries: Challenges from Jordan. Int J Disaster Risk Reduct. 2015;12(4):34-41. [DOI:10.1016/j.ijdrr.2014.11.005]
8. Ho C-C, Chen M-S. Risk assessment and quality improvement of liquid waste management in Taiwan University chemical laboratories. 2018;71(2):578-88. [DOI:10.1016/j.wasman.2017.09.029] [PMID]
9. Farshad AA, Khosravi Y, Alizadeh SS. The role of HSE management system in improving health, safety and environment performance in an oil organization. Iran Occup Heal. 2006;3(2):10-12.
10. Marendaz J-L, Suard J-C, Meyer T. A systematic tool for Assessment and Classification of Hazards in Laboratories (ACHiL). Saf Sci. 2013;53(3):168-76. [DOI:10.1016/j.ssci.2012.10.001]
11. Stamatis DH. Failure mode and effect analysis: FMEA from theory to execution. Quality Press; 2003.
12. Ericson CA. Hazard analysis techniques for system safety. John Wiley & Sons; 2015.
13. Yarmohammadi H, Poursadeghiyan M, Shorabi Y, Ebrahimi MH, Rezaei G, Biglari H, et al. Risk assessment in a wheat winnowing factory based on ET and BA method. J Eng Appl Sci. 2016;11(3):334-8.
14. Dehdashti A, Fatemi F, Jannati M, Asadi F, Kangarloo MB. Applying health, safety, and environmental risk assessment at academic settings. BMC Public Health. 2020;20(1):1-7. [DOI:10.1186/s12889-020-09419-5] [PMID] []
15. Omidvari M, Mansouri N, Nouri J. A pattern of fire risk assessment and emergency management in educational center laboratories. Saf Sci. 2015;73(1):34-42. [DOI:10.1016/j.ssci.2014.11.003]
16. Ali SSA, Waqas A, Shahzada K, Naqash T, Amjad A, Khan SN. Assessment of safety measures against seismic and fire hazards in the University of Buner. Disaster Adv. 2021;14(11):37-43. [DOI:10.25303/1411da3743]
17. Ménard AD, Trant JF. A review and critique of academic lab safety research. Nat Chem. 2020;12(1):17-25. [DOI:10.1038/s41557-019-0375-x] [PMID]
18. Wahab NAA, Aqila NA, Isa N, Husin NI, Zin AM, Mokhtar M, et al. A Systematic Review on Hazard Identification, Risk Assessment and Risk Control in Academic Laboratory. J Adv Res Appl Sci Eng Technol. 2021;24(1):47-62. [DOI:10.37934/araset.24.1.4762]
19. Meyer T. How about safety and risk management in research and education? Procedia Eng. 2012;42(1):854-64. [DOI:10.1016/j.proeng.2012.07.478]
20. Smet E. Theoretical Basis and Technical Reference Guide. FRAME; 2008.
21. Mirzaie Ali Abadi M, Rostami F, Mahdinia M, Karami Mosafer A, Derakhshan J, Feyze Arefi M. Analyzing the risk of fire in laboratories University of Medical Sciences used FRAME method. JSUMS, 2020; 26 (6):739 - 746.
22. Ma L, Ma X, Zhang J, Yang Q, Wei K. A Methodology for Dynamic Assessment of Laboratory Safety by SEM-SD. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021;18(12):6545. [DOI:10.3390/ijerph18126545] [PMID] []
23. Zhang B, Zhang F, Tang W. Research on The Hidden Dangers and Countermeasures of Electricity Safety in College Students' Apartments. IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science. 2021.42105. [DOI:10.1088/1755-1315/769/4/042105]
24. Moerschell L, Novak SS. Managing crisis in a university setting: The challenge of alignment. J Contingencies Cris Manag. 2020;28(1):30-40. [DOI:10.1111/1468-5973.12266]
25. Wang J-J. Study on the context of school-based disaster management. Int J Disaster Risk Reduct. 2016;19(2):224-34. [DOI:10.1016/j.ijdrr.2016.08.005]
Darvishi E, Abedi K, Mohammadian F, Osmani H, Saedi P, Khoubi J, et al . Identification of Hazards, Risk Assessment of the Campus Collection of Kurdistan University of Medical Sciences With the Aim of Crisis Management. SJKU 2024; 29 (3) :113-126 URL: http://sjku.muk.ac.ir/article-1-7413-en.html