|
1. Wilson AD, Kent B. The glass‐ionomer cement, a new translucent dental filling material. Journal of Applied Chemistry and Biotechnology. 1971;21(11):313-. 2. Croll TP, Nicholson J. Glass ionomer cements in pediatric dentistry: review of the literature. Pediatric dentistry. 2002;24(5):423-9. 3. Meyer JM, Cattani-Lorente MA, Dupuis V. Compomers: between glass-ionomer cements and composites. Biomaterials. 1998;19(6):529-39. 4. Piwowarczyk A, Ottl P, Lauer HC, Büchler A. Laboratory strength of glass ionomer cement, compomers, and resin composites. Journal of prosthodontics. 2002;11(2):86-91. 5. Hilton T, Hilton D, Randall R, Ferracane J. A clinical comparison of two cements for levels of post-operative sensitivity in a practice-based setting. Operative Dentistry-University of Washington-. 2004;29:241-8. 6. Chandrasekhar V. Post cementation sensitivity evaluation of glass Ionomer, zinc phosphate and resin modified glass Ionomer luting cements under class II inlays: An in vivo comparative study. Journal of conservative dentistry: JCD. 2010;13(1):23. 7. Jacobs MS, Windeler AS. An investigation of dental luting cement solubility as a function of the marginal gap. Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry. 1991;65(3):436-42. 8. Powers J, Sakaguchi R. Impression materials. Craig‘s restorative dental materials. Elsevier Mosby. 2006;294:95. 9. Mortier E, Gerdolle DA, Jacquot B, Panighi MM. Importance of water sorption and solubility studies for couple bonding agent--resin-based filling material. Oper Dent. 2004;29(6):669-76. 10. Wilson AD, Kent BE. A new translucent cement for dentistry. The glass ionomer cement. Br Dent J. 1972;132(4):133-5. 11. Lia ZC, White SN. Mechanical properties of dental luting cements. Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry. 1999;81(5):597-609. 12. Douglas W, editor Strength of the new systems, Glass Ionomers. The next generation, Proceedings of the 2nd International Symposium on Glass Ionomes; 1994. 13. Standard I. 9917.dentistry--Water-base cements--Part1:Powder/liquid acid base cements. International Organization for Standardization. 2007. 14. Prentice LH, Tyas MJ, Burrow MF. The effect of particle size distribution on an experimental glass-ionomer cement. Dental Materials. 2005;21(6):505-10. 15. Goshima T, Goshima Y. Radiographic detection of recurrent carious lesions associated with composite restorations. Oral Surgery, Oral Medicine, Oral Pathology. 1990;70(2):236-9. 16. Goshima T, Goshima Y. Optimum radiopacity of composite inlay materials and cements. Oral surgery, oral medicine, oral pathology. 1991;72(2):257-60. 17. Attar N, Tam LE, McComb D. Flow, strength, stiffness and radiopacity of flowable resin composites. Journal-Canadian Dental Association. 2003;69(8):516-21. 18. Espelid I, Tveit A, Erickson R, Keck S, Glasspoole E. Radiopacity of restorations and detection of secondary caries. Dental Materials. 1991;7(2):114-7. 19. Lachowski K, Botta S, Lascala C, Matos A, Sobral M. Study of the radio-opacity of base and liner dental materials using a digital radiography system. Dentomaxillofacial Radiology. 2013;42(2):20120153. 20. Ergücü Z, Türkün L, Önem E, Güneri P. Comparative radiopacity of six flowable resin composites. Operative dentistry. 2010;35(4):436-40. 21. Pedrosa R, Brasileiro I, dos Anjos Pontual M, dos Anjos Pontual A, da Silveira M. Influence of materials radiopacity in the radiographic diagnosis of secondary caries: evaluation in film and two digital systems. Dentomaxillofacial Radiology. 2011;40(6):344-50.
|
