|
The effect of offline student conferences on the levels of satisfaction, learning and performance of medical intern students on the basis of the Kirkpatrick’s educational model
|
Ezatolah Rahimi Rahimi1    , Nasrin Moghimi2 , Solmaz Derakhshan1 , Roonak Mohajerpour3 , Khaled Rahmani4 , Yadolah Zarezadeh5 |
1- Kurdistan University of Medical Sciences & Department of Internal Medicine, Kurdistan University of Medical Sciences, Sanandaj, Iran
2- Kurdistan University of Medical Sciences & Department of Rheumatology, School of Medicine, Kurdistan University of Medical Sciences, Sanandaj, Iran
3- Islamic Azad University, Sanandaj & PhD Candidate, Educational Management Department, Islamic Azad University, Sanandaj, Iran
4- Kurdistan University of Medical Sciences & Associate Professor in Epidemiology, Liver and Digestive Research Center, Research Institute for Health Development, Kurdistan University of Medical Sciences, Sanandaj, Iran
5- Kurdistan University of Medical Sciences & Social Determinants of Health Research Center, Research Institute for Health Development, Kurdistan University of Medical Sciences, Sanandaj, Iran , yadzar204@gmail.com |
|
|
Abstract: (1970 Views) |
Background and Aim: One of the consequences of the Corona virus pandemic was the necessity of using virtual facilities. The use of new technologies has provided a new platform for the education. This study was conducted to determine the level of satisfaction, learning and performance of medical trainees based on Kirkpatrick's model from offline conferences in the internal department of Kurdistan Medical School in 2021.
Material and Methods: This was a quasi-experimental study. Total of 74 medical students were included in the study. An offline conference programe was scheduled for the students, and each student was assigned a title to present. The conferences received feedback from professors and peers. The first three levels of Kirkpatrick's model including reaction, learning and behavior were investigated. The relationship between variables was analyzed based on the type of variable. Independent t-tests and one-way analysis of variance were used to compare the difference in mean scores in two-mode (gender) and more than two-mode (percentage of viewing offline conferences) variables.
Results: 74 students including 41 males and 33 females were investigated. The mean and standard deviation of their age was 23.98 with a standard deviation of 2.3 years. The results showed that 17 of the students, i.e. 37.7% of the studied participants, had viewed less than 50% of the conferences, 15 of them, i.e. 33.3, had viewed between 50% and 90% of the conferences, and 13 of them, i.e. 28.8%, had seen more than 90% of the conferences. Table 1 shows the mean, standard deviation, and minimum and maximum scores of MCQ and OSCE exams, as well as the participants' satisfaction with holding offline educational conferences.
Conclosion: Conducting offline conferences by medical students has been useful and had a positive impact on students' reaction and learning levels. Nevertheless, it is necessary to evaluate its impact on the level of behavior.
|
|
| Keywords: Kirkpatrick's evaluation model, Efectivness of Education, Medical Education |
|
|
Full-Text [PDF 522 kb]
(238 Downloads)
|
Type of Study: Original Research |
Subject:
Medical ٍEducation
Received: 2024/02/8 | Accepted: 2024/08/20 | Published: 2024/12/29
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| References |
1. Ciotti M, Ciccozzi M, Terrinoni A, Jiang WC, Wang CB, Bernardini S. The COVID-19 pandemic. Crit Rev Clin Lab Sci. 2020; 17;57(6):365-88. [ DOI:10.1080/10408363.2020.1783198] [ PMID] 2. Ksiazek TG, Erdman D, Goldsmith CS, Zaki SR, Peret T, Emery S, Tong S, Urbani C, Comer JA, Lim W, Rollin PE. A novel coronavirus associated with severe acute respiratory syndrome. N Engl J Med. 2003; 15;348(20):1953-66. [ DOI:10.1056/NEJMoa030781] [ PMID] 3. Amanat F, Stadlbauer D, Strohmeier S, Nguyen T, Chromikova V, McMahon M, Jiang K, Asthagiri-Arunkumar G, Jurczyszak D, Polanco J, Bermudez-Gonzalez M. A serological assay to detect SARS-CoV-2 seroconversion in humans. medRxiv. 2020;26(7):1033-6
https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.03.17.20037713 [ DOI:10.1038/s41591-020-0913-5] [ PMID] [ ] 4. Wright BM. Blended Learning: Sudent Perception of Face-to-Face and Online EFL Lessons. Indones. J Appl Linguist. 2017; 1;7(1). [ DOI:10.17509/ijal.v7i1.6859] 5. Gao J, Yang L, Zou J, Fan X. Comparison of the influence of massive open online courses and traditional teaching methods in medical education in China: A meta‐analysis. Biochem Mol Biol Educ. 2021;49(4):639-51. [ DOI:10.1002/bmb.21523] [ PMID] 6. Farooq F, Rathore FA, Mansoor SN. Challenges of online medical education in Pakistan during COVID-19 pandemic. J Coll Physicians Surg Pak. 2020; 1;30(6):67-9. [ DOI:10.29271/jcpsp.2020.Supp1.S67] [ PMID] 7. Fatima SS, Idrees R, Jabeen K, Sabzwari S, Khan S. Online assessment in undergraduate medical education: Challenges and solutions from a LMIC university. Pak J Med Sci. 2021;37(4):945. [ DOI:10.12669/pjms.37.4.3948] [ PMID] [ ] 8. Ifediora CO. Online medical education for doctors: identifying potential gaps to the traditional, face-to-face modality. J Med Educ Curric Dev. 2019; 6:2382120519827912. [ DOI:10.1177/2382120519827912] [ PMID] [ ] 9. Singh P, Sinha R, Koay WL, Teoh KB, Nayak P, Lim CH, Dubey AK, Das A, Faturrahman I, Aryani DN. A comparative study on effectiveness of online and offline learning in higher education. IJTHAP. 2021; 4(3):102-14. [ DOI:10.32535/ijthap.v4i3.1212] 10. Farjad S. The Evaluation Effectiveness of training courses in University by Kirkpatrick Model (case study: Islamshahr university). Procedia Soc. 2012; 46:2837-41. [ DOI:10.1016/j.sbspro.2012.05.573] 11. Kirkpatrick DL. Evaluating human relations programs for industrial foremen and supervisors. University of Wisconsin--Madison; 1954. 12. Alliger GM, Tannenbaum SI, Bennett Jr W, Traver H, Shotland A. A meta‐analysis of the relations among training criteria. Pers Psychol. 1997; 50(2):341-58. [ DOI:10.1111/j.1744-6570.1997.tb00911.x] 13. Changiz T, Fakhari M, Omid A. Kirkpatrick's model: A framework for evaluating the effectiveness of short-term and in-service training programs. Iran J Med Educ. 2014; 10;13(12):1058-72. 14. Yaqoob Mohammed Al Jabri F, Kvist T, Azimirad M, Turunen H. A systematic review of healthcare professionals' core competency instruments. Nurs Health Sci. 2021; 23(1):87-102. [ DOI:10.1111/nhs.12804] [ PMID] 15. Maudsley G, Taylor D. Analysing synthesis of evidence in a systematic review in health professions education: observations on struggling beyond Kirkpatrick. Med Educ Online. 2020;25(1):1731278. [ DOI:10.1080/10872981.2020.1731278] [ PMID] [ ] 16. Khoshnoodi Far M, Mohajerpour R, Rahimi E, Roshani D, Zarezadeh Y. Comparison between the effects of flipped class and traditional methods of instruction on satisfaction, active participation, and learning level in a continuous medical education course for general practitioners. SJKU. 2019;24(1): 56-65 [ DOI:10.29252/sjku.24.1.56] 17. Vishwanathan K, Patel GM, Patel DJ. Impact and perception about distant online medical education (tele-education) on the educational environment during the COVID-19 pandemic: Experiences of medical undergraduate students from India. J Family Med Prim Care. 2021;10(6):2216. [ DOI:10.4103/jfmpc.jfmpc_2306_20] [ PMID] [ ] 18. Chan A, Cao A, Kim L, Gui S, Ahuja M, Kamhawy R, Latchupatula L. Comparison of perceived educational value of an in-person versus virtual medical conference. Can Med Educ J. 2021;12(4):65-9. [ DOI:10.36834/cmej.71975] [ PMID] [ ] 19. Singh P, Sinha R, Koay WL, Teoh KB, Nayak P, Lim CH, Dubey AK, Das A, Faturrahman I, Aryani DN. A comparative study on effectiveness of online and offline learning in higher education. IJTHAP. 2021; 19;4(3):102-14. [ DOI:10.32535/ijthap.v4i3.1212] 20. Ramezani G, Zarezadeh Y, Sohrabi Z. Elaboration of indices of the Third Generation of the Universities of Medical Sciences: Status quo assessment of Iran University of Medical Sciences. J Educ Health Promot. 2021 1;10(1):255. [ DOI:10.4103/jehp.jehp_1462_20] [ PMID] [ ] 21. Pei L, Wu H. Does online learning work better than offline learning in undergraduate medical education? A systematic review and meta-analysis. Med Educ Online. 2019;24(1):1666538. [ DOI:10.1080/10872981.2019.1666538] [ PMID] [ ] 22. Kirkpatrick DL. Implementing the four levels: A practical guide for effective evaluation of training programs. Berrett-Koehler Publishers; 2007. 23. Fitriani N, Nikensari SI, Handaru AW. Comparison of the effectiveness of the offiline and online learning methods in the new normal era. IJESSR. 2023; 06(06):117-126 [ DOI:10.37500/IJESSR.2023.6608] |
|
| Send email to the article author |
|
|
|
| Add your comments about this article |
|
|
|
|
Ethics code: IR.MUK.REC.1400.324
Rahimi E R, Moghimi N, Derakhshan S, Mohajerpour R, Rahmani K, Zarezadeh Y. The effect of offline student conferences on the levels of satisfaction, learning and performance of medical intern students on the basis of the Kirkpatrick’s educational model. SJKU 2024; 29 (5) :99-107 URL: http://sjku.muk.ac.ir/article-1-8309-en.html
|
