[Home ] [Archive]   [ فارسی ]  
:: Main :: About :: Current Issue :: Archive :: Search :: Submit :: Contact ::
Main Menu
Home::
Journal Information::
Articles archive::
For Authors::
For Reviewers::
Subscription::
Contact us::
Site Facilities::
Webmail::
::
Search in website

Advanced Search
..
Receive site information
Enter your Email in the following box to receive the site news and information.
..
Journal Citation Index

 

Citation Indices from GS

AllSince 2019
Citations90565468
h-index3825
i10-index237140

 

..
Central Library of Kurdistan University of Medical Sciences
AWT IMAGE
..
Vice-Chancellery for Research and Technology
AWT IMAGE
..
SCImago Journal & Country Rank
:: Volume 24, Issue 2 (Scientific Journal of Kurdistan University of Medical Sciences 2019) ::
SJKU 2019, 24(2): 30-40 Back to browse issues page
Comparison between the effects of propofol-ketamine and propofol-fentanyl for sedation in cataract surgery
Sayed Morteza Heidari1 , Hamid Reza Shetabi 2, Saeed TarashiKashani3
1- Faiz Medical Center, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan, Iran.
2- Faiz Medical Center, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan, Iran. , hamidshetabi@med.mui.ac.ir
3- Student Research Committee, Al-Zahra Medical Center, Isfahan
Abstract:   (3162 Views)
Background and Aim: Considering the importance of proper sedation in cataract surgery, this study was conducted to make a comparison between the effects of ketamine-propofol combination and fentanyl-propofol combination for sedation in phacoemulsification surgery.
Methods: In this clinical trial study, 84 patients who were candidates for phacoemulsification cataract surgery were assigned to two groups. Each group consisted of 42 patients. Ketamine-propofol combination and fentanyl-propofol combination were used for induction of sedation for the first and second groups respectively. We assessed and compared sedation depth (using Ramsay score), hemodynamic parameters during operation and recovery, and satisfaction of the patients and surgeons between the two groups.
Results: There were no significant differences between the two groups in terms of baseline variables, demographic characteristics, sedation index and patient and surgeon satisfaction.
There was no significant difference between two groups in relation to blood pressure during operation and recovery periods but the heart rate at the 10th minute of the operation and at the beginning of the recovery in the ketofol group was significantly higher, and also the mean Spo2 was higher in the ketofol group at the 10th minute of operation. Patients in the ketofol group showed less hemodynamic changes.
Conclusion: Both combinations of ketamine-propofol and fentanyl-propofol were associated with the effective sedation, satisfaction of the patients and the surgeons. But generally, hemodynamic status was more stable in the patients in the ketofol group.
Keywords: Sedation, Ketamine, Propofol, Fentanyl, Cataract
Full-Text [PDF 926 kb]   (1238 Downloads)    
Type of Study: Original Research | Subject: General
Received: 2019/01/27 | Published: 2019/06/15
Send email to the article author

Add your comments about this article
Your username or Email:

CAPTCHA



XML   Persian Abstract   Print


Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:

Heidari S M, Shetabi H R, TarashiKashani S. Comparison between the effects of propofol-ketamine and propofol-fentanyl for sedation in cataract surgery. SJKU 2019; 24 (2) :30-40
URL: http://sjku.muk.ac.ir/article-1-4755-en.html


Rights and permissions
Creative Commons License This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Volume 24, Issue 2 (Scientific Journal of Kurdistan University of Medical Sciences 2019) Back to browse issues page
مجله علمی دانشگاه علوم پزشکی کردستان Scientific Journal of Kurdistan University of Medical Sciences
مجله علمی دانشگاه علوم پزشکی کردستان Scientific Journal of Kurdistan University of Medical Sciences
Persian site map - English site map - Created in 0.06 seconds with 45 queries by YEKTAWEB 4645