[Home ] [Archive]   [ فارسی ]  
:: Main :: About :: Current Issue :: Archive :: Search :: Submit :: Contact ::
Main Menu
Home::
Journal Information::
Articles archive::
For Authors::
For Reviewers::
Subscription::
Contact us::
Site Facilities::
Webmail::
::
Search in website

Advanced Search
..
Receive site information
Enter your Email in the following box to receive the site news and information.
..
Journal Citation Index

 

Citation Indices from GS

AllSince 2020
Citations101095525
h-index3926
i10-index259134

 

..
Central Library of Kurdistan University of Medical Sciences
AWT IMAGE
..
Vice-Chancellery for Research and Technology
AWT IMAGE
..
SCImago Journal & Country Rank
:: Volume 13, Issue 4 (Scientific Journal of Kurdistan University of Medical Science 2009) ::
SJKU 2009, 13(4): 9-15 Back to browse issues page
Remifentanil versus propofol on pain and hemodynamic in patients under phacoemulsification with topical anesthesia
Mohammad Reza Fazel1 , Zahra Forghani , Seyed Mohammad Reza Razavizadeh , Salah Zabihi , Mohammad Saleh Vahedi , Hanieh Adib
1- , drmfazel@gmail.com
Abstract:   (13741 Views)
Background and Aim: To evaluate the effect of propofol and remifentanil on pain and hemodynamic in patients under phacoemulsification with topical anesthesia. Material and Methods: After Ethic’s committee approval in a clinical trial study, 100 consecutive patients scheduled for phacoemulsification were randomized to 2 groups in a prospective manner. Each group received intravenous infusion 3 mg/kg/h propofol or 3 µ/kg/h remifentanil. Phaco time, blood pressure and heart rate before and after surgery, number of patients with respiratory depression (O2 sat<90%) and vomiting, pain scores, ophthalmologist satisfaction and demographic data were recorded. Results: Mean age, sex and phaco time were equal in the two groups. Systolic and diastolic blood pressure and heart rate were decreased significantly (p<0.05) in propofol group but this difference in remifentanil was not significant. Patients had more pain in propofol group (p=0.001) and the surgeon satisfaction was higher in remifentanil group (p=0.01). Two patients in the remifentanil group had respiratory depression but the difference was not statistically significant (p>0.05). Perioperative vomiting was not found in any groups. Conclusion: With the doses used in this study, It was shown that remifentanil was more effective than propofol in minimizing pain and hemodynamic stability without producing excessive, respiratory depression or perioperative nausea and vomiting. Key words: Remifentanil, Propofol, Pain, Topical anesthesia, Phacoemulsification Conflict of Interest: Nill Received: October 9, 2008 Accepted: February 20, 2009
Keywords: Remifentanil, Propofol, Pain, Topical anesthesia, Phacoemulsification
Full-Text [PDF 137 kb]   (2097 Downloads)    
Type of Study: Original Research | Subject: General
Received: 2009/05/2 | Published: 2009/03/15
Send email to the article author

Add your comments about this article
Your username or Email:

CAPTCHA


XML   Persian Abstract   Print


Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:

Fazel M R, Forghani Z, Razavizadeh S M R, Zabihi S, Vahedi M S, Adib H. Remifentanil versus propofol on pain and hemodynamic in patients under phacoemulsification with topical anesthesia. SJKU 2009; 13 (4) :9-15
URL: http://sjku.muk.ac.ir/article-1-95-en.html


Rights and permissions
Creative Commons License This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Volume 13, Issue 4 (Scientific Journal of Kurdistan University of Medical Science 2009) Back to browse issues page
مجله علمی دانشگاه علوم پزشکی کردستان Scientific Journal of Kurdistan University of Medical Sciences
مجله علمی دانشگاه علوم پزشکی کردستان Scientific Journal of Kurdistan University of Medical Sciences
Persian site map - English site map - Created in 0.05 seconds with 45 queries by YEKTAWEB 4710