:: Volume 23, Issue 1 (Scientific Journal of Kurdistan University of Medical Sciences 2018) ::
SJKU 2018, 23(1): 84-92 Back to browse issues page
The effects of two traditional and post-activation potentiation warm-up methods on ground reaction forces during squat-jump
Sajad Avazzadeh Samani1 , Mehrdad Anbarian 2, Mohammad Hossein Ghasemi3
1- Faculty of Sport Sciences, Bu Ali Sina University, Hamedan, Iran.
2- Faculty of Sport Sciences, BuAli Sina University, Hamedan, Iran , anbarian@basu.ac.ir
3- PhD candidate, Faculty of Sport Sciences, Bu Ali Sina University, Hamedan, Iran.
Abstract:   (21424 Views)
Background and Aim: A proper warm-up method can be used as a strategy to improve performance of athletes in various sport fields. The purpose of the present study was to assess the effect of traditional and post-activation potentiation warm-up methods on ground reaction forces during squat jump.
Materials and Methods: Fourteen trained male athletes (age=26.5±3.64 years, weight=70±10.65 kg, height=180 ± 8.39 cm) participated voluntarily in this study. Athletes randomly performed three different warm-up protocols on three separate days: typical traditional warm-up method, static and dynamic post-activation potentiation implementing half-squat at 90% 1RM. After performing the warm-up protocols, the subjects completed squat jump test on a force platform in order to assess ground reaction forces.
Results: In the jumping and landing phases, the peak values of horizontal and vertical ground reaction forces in the traditional warm-up method were significantly lower than those in the static (P=0.001 for both phases) and dynamic (P=0.001 for both phases) PAP warm-up methods. Also, we found a significant difference in the horizontal peak ground reaction force in the jumping phase between the static and dynamic PAP warm-up methods (P=0.003). In addition, significant differences in the vertical jump height and rate of force development (RFD) were observed between the traditional and static PAP warm-up methods (P=0.001 for both methods), between the traditional and dynamic PAP warm-up methods (P=0.001 for both methods), and also between the static and dynamic PAP warm-up methods (P=0.002 and P=0.003, respectively).
Conclusion: According to the results of this study, it seems that the PAP warm-up method may have more advantage over traditional warm-up method in order to improve record and performance of the athletes during squat jump movement.
Keywords: Warm-up, Ground reaction force, Post-activation potentiation (PAP), Squat jump.
 
Received: Sep 6, 2017     Accepted: Jan 8, 2018
Keywords: Warm-up, Ground reaction force, Post-activation potentiation (PAP), Squat jump.
Full-Text [PDF 606 kb]   (1730 Downloads)    
Type of Study: Original Research | Subject: General
Received: 2018/03/17 | Accepted: 2018/03/17 | Published: 2018/03/17



XML   Persian Abstract   Print



Rights and permissions
Creative Commons License This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Volume 23, Issue 1 (Scientific Journal of Kurdistan University of Medical Sciences 2018) Back to browse issues page