1. Kilic C, Kamburoğlu K, Ozen T, Balcioglu H, Kurt B, Kutoglu T, et al. The position of the mandibular canal and histologic feature of the inferior alveolar nerve. Clin Anat. 2010;23(1):34-42.

2. Aljarbou FA, Aldosimani MA, Althumairy RI, Alhezam AA, Aldawsari AI. An analysis of the first and second mandibular molar roots proximity to the inferior alveolar canal and cortical plates using cone beam computed tomography among the Saudi population. Saudi Medl J. 2019;40(2):189-94.

3. Felice P, Cannizzaro G, Checchi V, Marchetti C, Pellegrino G, Censi P, et al. Vertical bone augmentation versus 7-mm-long implants in posterior atrophic mandibles. Results of a randomised controlled clinical trial of up to 4 months after loading. Eur J Oral Implantol. 2009;2(1):7-20.

4. Suomalainen A, Ventä I, Mattila M, Turtola L, Vehmas T, Peltola JS. Reliability of CBCT and other radiographic methods in preoperative evaluation of lower third molars. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 2010;109(2):276-84.

5. Watanabe H, Mohammad Abdul M, Kurabayashi T, Aoki H. Mandible size and morphology determined with CT on a premise of dental implant operation. Surg Radiol Anat. 2010;32(4):343-9.

6. Mavili ME, Canter HI, Saglam-Aydinatay B. Semirigid fixation of mandible and maxilla in orthognathic surgery: stability and advantages. Ann Plast Surg. 2009;63(4):396-403.

7. Simonton JD, Azevedo B, Schindler WG, Hargreaves KM. Age-and gender-related differences in the position of the inferior alveolar nerve by using cone beam computed tomography. J Endod. 2009;35(7):944-9.

8. Silva FMS, Cortez ALV, Moreira RWF, Mazzonetto R. Complications of intraoral donor site for bone grafting prior to implant placement. Implant Dent. 2006;15(4):420-6.

9. Worthington P. Injury to the inferior alveolar nerve during implant placement: a formula for protection of the patient and clinician. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2004;19(5):731-4.

10. Vazquez L, Saulacic N, Belser U, Bernard JP. Efficacy of panoramic radiographs in the preoperative planning of posterior mandibular implants: a prospective clinical study of 1527 consecutively treated patients. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2008;19(1):81-5.

11. Gerlach NL, Meijer GJ, Maal TJ, Mulder J, Rangel FA, Borstlap WA, et al. Reproducibility of 3 different tracing methods based on cone beam computed tomography in determining the anatomical position of the mandibular canal. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2010;68(4):811-7.

12. Parikh S. Bone graft substitutes: past, present, future. J Postgrad Med. 2002;48(2):142-8.

13. Scarfe WC, Farman AG, Sukovic P. Clinical applications of cone-beam computed tomography in dental practice. J Can Dent Assoc. 2006;72(1):75-80.

14. Ozturk A, Potluri A, Vieira AR. Position and course of the mandibular canal in skulls. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol. 2012;113(4):453-8.

15. El Hadidi YN, Taha AMA, El Sadat SMA, Saber SM. Anatomical Analysis of Inferior Alveolar Nerve Relation to Mandibular Posterior Teeth Using Cone Beam Computed Tomography: A Retrospective Radiographic Analysis Study. J Maxillofac Oral Surg. 2022;23:1-7.

16. Taschieri S, Vitelli C, Albano D, Sconfienza L, Del Fabbro M, Francetti L, et al. Evaluation of mental foramen and inferior alveolar nerve canal and its relationship to adjacent anatomical landmarks using cone-beam computer tomography. J Biol Regul Homeost Agents. 2021;35(2 Suppl. 1):107-15.

17. Sharaan ME-S, Abdulla AY, Ragab MH. Assessment of the relationship of the distance between mandibular first and second molars with the inferior alveolar canal and cortical bone plate in an Egyptian subpopulation: a CBCT study. Braz Oral Res. 2022;36:e033.

18. Mendonca P, Praveen B, Shubha G, Shubhasini A, Keerthi G. Evaluation of inferior alveolar canal course using cone-beam computed tomography. J Adv Clin Res Insights. 2019;6(6):171-7.

19. de Oliveira Júnior MR, Saud ALS, Fonseca DR, De-Ary-Pires B, Pires-Neto MA, de Ary-Pires R. Morphometrical analysis of the human mandibular canal: a CT investigation. Surg Radiol Anat. 2011;33(4):345-52.

20. Aksoy U, Aksoy S, Orhan K. A cone‐beam computed tomography study of the anatomical relationships between mandibular teeth and the mandibular canal, with a review of the current literature. Microsc Res Tech. 2018;81(3):308-14.

21. Bürklein S, Grund C, Schäfer E. Relationship between root apices and the mandibular canal: a cone-beam computed tomographic analysis in a German population. J Endod. 2015;41(10):1696-700.

22. Kawashima Y, Sakai O, Shosho D, Kaneda T, Gohel A. Proximity of the Mandibular Canal to Teeth and Cortical Bone. J Endod. 2016;42(2):221-4.

23. Razumova S, Brago A, Howijieh A, Barakat H, Kozlova Y, Razumov N. Evaluation the Relationship between Mandibular Molar Root Apices and Mandibular Canal among Residents of the Moscow Population using Cone-Beam Computed Tomography Technique. Contemp Clin Dent. 2022;13(1):3-8.

24. Usta SN, Eymirli A. Assessment of relationship between the mandibular canal and root apices. Clin Dent Res. 2021;45(1):61-8.

25. Kovisto T, Ahmad M, Bowles WR. Proximity of the mandibular canal to the tooth apex. J Endod. 2011;37(3):311-5.