1. 1.Ajami B, Abachizadeh H, Shafieyan R, Aminifar S. Evaluation of Microleakage in Pulpotomized Primary Molars Restored with Core max II: An In Vitro Study. J Mashhad Dent School. 2012;36(3):231-8.

2. Toledano M, Osorio R, Ceballos L, Fuentes MV, Fernandes C, Tay FR, et al. Microtensile bond strength of several adhesive systems to different dentin depths. Am J Dent. 2003;16(5):292-8.

3. Sidhu S. Glass‐ionomer cement restorative materials: a sticky subject? Aust Dent J. 2011;56:23-30. [DOI:10.1111/j.1834-7819.2010.01293.x] [PMID]

4. Prentice LH, Tyas MJ, Burrow MF. The effect of mixing time on the handling and compressive strength of an encapsulated glass-ionomer cement. Dent Mater. 2005;21(8):704-8. [DOI:10.1016/j.dental.2004.09.006] [PMID]

5. Asselin M-E, Fortin D, Sitbon Y, Rompre PH. Marginal microleakage of a sealant applied to permanent enamel: evaluation of 3 application protocols. Pediatr Dent. 2008;30(1):29-33.

6. Mali P, Deshpande S, Singh A. Microleakage of restorative materials: an in vitro study. J Indian Soc Pedod Prev Dent. 2006;24(1):15. [DOI:10.4103/0970-4388.22828] [PMID]

7. Panahandeh N, Khalilzadeh S, Hoseini Tabatabaei S, SHarifi Shoshtari S. Efficacy of curing flowable composite lining on microleakage in class II composite restorations: An in vitro study. Res Dent Sci. 2015;12(2):54-8.

8. Alrahlah A. Diametral tensile strength, flexural strength, and surface microhardness of bioactive bulk fill restorative. J Contemp Dent Pract. 2018;19(1):13-9. [DOI:10.5005/jp-journals-10024-2205] [PMID]

9. De Caluwé T, Vercruysse C, Ladik I, Convents R, Declercq H, Martens L, et al. Addition of bioactive glass to glass ionomer cements: Effect on the physico-chemical properties and biocompatibility. Dent Mater. 2017;33(4):e186-e203. [DOI:10.1016/j.dental.2017.01.007] [PMID]

10. Ali AS, EL-Malt MA, Mohamed EA-R. A Comparative Evaluation of EQUIA Forte Microleakage Versus Resin-Modified Glass Ionomer. Al-Azhar Dent J Girl. 2019;6(3):249-54. [DOI:10.21608/adjg.2019.6774.1065]

11. Basso M, Brambilla E, Benites M, Giovannardi M, Ionescu A. Glassionomer cement for permanent dental restorations: a 48-months, multi-centre, prospective clinical trial. Stoma Edu J. 2015;2(1):25-35. [DOI:10.25241/stomaeduj.2015.2(1).art.1]

12. Gurgan S, Kutuk Z, Ergin E, Oztas S, Cakir F. Four-year randomized clinical trial to evaluate the clinical performance of a glass ionomer restorative system. Oper Dent. 2015;40(2):134-43. [DOI:10.2341/13-239-C] [PMID]

13. Ebaya MM, Ali AI, Mahmoud SH. Evaluation of Marginal Adaptation and Microleakage of Three Glass Ionomer-Based Class V Restorations: In Vitro Study. Eur J Dent. 2019;13(4):599-606. [DOI:10.1055/s-0039-3401435] [PMID] []

14. Omidi BR, Naeini FF, Dehghan H, Tamiz P, Savadroodbari MM, Jabbarian R. Microleakage of an Enhanced Resin-Modified Glass Ionomer Restorative Material in Primary Molars. J Dent (Tehran). 2018;15(4):205-13.

15. Chuang S-F, Chang C-H, Yaman P, Chang L-T. Influence of enamel wetness on resin composite restorations using various dentine bonding agents: Part I-effects on marginal quality and enamel microcrack formation. J Dent. 2006;34(5):343-51. [DOI:10.1016/j.jdent.2005.07.006] [PMID]

16. Grande RHM, Reis A, Loguercio AD, Singer JdM, Shellard E, Christino Neto P. Adhesive systems used for sealing contaminated surfaces: a microleakage evaluation. Braz Oral Res. 2005;19(1):17-22. [DOI:10.1590/S1806-83242005000100004] [PMID]

17. Seraj B, Paryab M. Comparing the microleakage of Equia Fort Glass ionomer, Amalgam and composite resin in class II restorations of Pulpotomized Primary molars. Iran J Ped Dent. 2018;14(1):11-24. [DOI:10.29252/ijpd.14.1.11]

18. Gopinath VK. Comparative evaluation of microleakage between bulk esthetic materials versus resin-modified glass ionomer to restore Class II cavities in primary molars. J Indian Soc Pedod Prev Dent. 2017;35(3):238. [DOI:10.4103/JISPPD.JISPPD_17_17] [PMID]

19. Amaral I, Gameiro A, Lopes L, Ventura I. In vitro study of microleakage and microhardness of high viscosity glass ionomer cement and resin modified glass ionomer cement. J Dent Oral Hyg. 2017;1:283-9.

20. Sharafeddin F, Feizi N. Evaluation of the effect of adding micro-hydroxyapatite and nano-hydroxyapatite on the microleakage of conventional and resin-modified Glass-ionomer Cl V restorations. J Clin Exp Dent. 2017;9(2):e242. [DOI:10.4317/jced.53216] [PMID] []

21. Bollu IP, Hari A, Thumu J, Velagula LD, Bolla N, Varri S, et al. Comparative evaluation of microleakage between nano-ionomer, giomer and resin modified glass ionomer cement in class V cavities-CLSM study. J Clin Diagn Res: JCDR. 2016;10(5):ZC66. [DOI:10.7860/JCDR/2016/18730.7798] [PMID] []

22. Ferracane JL. Developing a more complete understanding of stresses produced in dental composites during polymerization. Dent Mater. 2005;21(1):36-42. [DOI:10.1016/j.dental.2004.10.004] [PMID]

23. Ebaya MM, Ali AI, Mahmoud SH. Evaluation of marginal adaptation and microleakage of three glass ionomer-based Class V restorations: in vitro study. Eur J Dent. 2019;13(4):599. [DOI:10.1055/s-0039-3401435] [PMID] []

24. Eronat N, Yilmaz E, Kara N, Topaloglu AA. Comparative evaluation of microleakage of nano-filled resin-modified glass ionomer: An in vitro study. Eur J Dent. 2014;8(4):450. [DOI:10.4103/1305-7456.143615] [PMID] []

25. Masih S, Koshy G, Joshi J. Comparative evaluation of the microleakage of two modified glass ionomer cements on primary molars. An in vivo study. J Indian Soc Pedod Prev Dent. 2011;29(2):135. [DOI:10.4103/0970-4388.84686] [PMID]

26. Yu H, Li Q, Attin T, Wang Y. Protective effect of resin coating on the microleakage of Class V restorations following treatment with carbamide peroxide in vitro. Oper Dent. 2010;35(6):634-40. [DOI:10.2341/10-039-LR] [PMID]

27. Bonifácio CC, Werner A, Kleverlaan CJ. Coating glass-ionomer cements with a nanofilled resin. Acta Odontol Scand. 2012;70(6):471-7. [DOI:10.3109/00016357.2011.639307] [PMID]

28. Diem VT, Tyas MJ, Ngo HC, Phuong LH, Khanh ND. The effect of a nano-filled resin coating on the 3-year clinical performance of a conventional high-viscosity glass-ionomer cement. Clin Oral Investig. 2014;18(3):753-9. [DOI:10.1007/s00784-013-1026-z] [PMID]

29. Türkün LS, Kanik Ö. A Prospective Six-Year Clinical Study Evaluating Reinforced Glass Ionomer Cements with Resin Coating on Posterior Teeth: Quo Vadis? Oper Dent. 2016;41(6):587-98. [DOI:10.2341/15-331-C] [PMID]

30. Akman H, Tosun G. Clinical evaluation of bulk-fill resins and glass ionomer restorative materials: A 1-year follow-up randomized clinical trial in children. Niger J Clin Pract. 2020;23(4):489-97. [DOI:10.4103/njcp.njcp_519_19] [PMID]

31. Balkaya H, Arslan S, Pala K. A randomized, prospective clinical study evaluating effectiveness of a bulk-fill composite resin, a conventional composite resin and a reinforced glass ionomer in Class II cavities: one-year results. J Appl Oral Sci: revista FOB. 2019;27:e20180678. [DOI:10.1590/1678-7757-2018-0678] [PMID] []

32. Omidi BR, Naeini FF, Dehghan H, Tamiz P, Savadroodbari MM, Jabbarian R. Microleakage of an enhanced resin-modified glass ionomer restorative material in primary molars. J Dent (Tehran, Iran). 2018;15(4):205.

33. Mitra SB, Lee C-Y, Bui HT, Tantbirojn D, Rusin RP. Long-term adhesion and mechanism of bonding of a paste-liquid resin-modified glass-ionomer. Dent Mater. 2009;25(4):459-66. [DOI:10.1016/j.dental.2008.09.008] [PMID]

34. Siddiqui F, Karkare S. Sealing Ability of Nano-ionomer in Primary Teeth: An ex vivo Study. Int J Clin Pediatr Dent. 2016;9(3):209. [DOI:10.5005/jp-journals-10005-1365] [PMID] []

35. Perdigão J, Dutra-Corrêa M, Saraceni S, Ciaramicoli M, Kiyan V. Randomized clinical trial of two resin-modified glass ionomer materials: 1-year results. Oper Dent. 2012;37(6):591-601. [DOI:10.2341/11-415-C] [PMID]

36. AL-Shimmary AF, Hassan AM. Evaluation of The Microleakage of Polyacid Modified Composite Compared to Hybrid Composite and Resin Modified Glass Ionomer Cement in Primary and Permanent Teeth Restoration (An in vitro study). J Baghdad College Dent. 2019;31(2):36-43. [DOI:10.26477/jbcd.v31i2.2622]